Assigment three

Considering this week’s lecture and reading, "Ornament and Crime” by Adolf Loos, respond to the following question (approximately 150 - 250 words, as needed):

Adolf Loos argued in 1908 that, “The evolution of culture is synonymous with the removal of ornament from objects of daily use.” Do you agree or disagree? Why?

2. Post your response in your DSDN171 blog along with an image supporting your argument. Be sure to address this image in your response. Also please include specific references to our reading and/or lecture for the week to support your response.

An ornament is “a pure, abstract carrier of beauty and culture” (slide 31). Disagreeing with Adolf Loos argument, I believe that the removal of ornaments from objects of daily use would remove a significant proportion of the culture surrounding this object. The design of an object is influenced in some way by the cultural attributes of the designer. Furthermore I believe that these attributes of the different cultures in the world are what make the designs of objects different. I believe the removal of ornaments from designs would have a lingering affect upon the evolution of culture within a society, as individuals would lose their ability to create a unique cultural flair to their designs.

I deem that the addiction of the ornaments to daily objects, are there for cultural purposes to begin with. As the designer may have been motivated by his/her culture, and wanted to create their mark upon the world through the object they are designing. The addition of ornaments helps modify their culture, making it different from another, and through time becoming defining points for their particular culture.

K.P. Moritz (1785) stated that “we seem to lose ourselves in the beautiful object.” And I believe this to be true, however I think it is human nature to “willingly allow our pleasure, which beauty defines for us, to take precedence over all our other feelings” furthermore I believe we display our culture differences all the time, including in what we choose to furnish our homes with. This choice allows us to display our culture heritage to others, shown through the image of the Indian sideboard shown bellow.

Contradicting Adolf Loos, I believe that we should not be trying to extinguish our culture backgrounds, but hold on to them. As we grow more and more as a society our cultures are combining, and we are losing what makes us different.